Desenvolvimento de um Framework Pedagógico Integrado de Inteligência Artificial para a Formação Inicial de Professores

Palavras-chave

Inteligência Artificial na Educação
Formação Inicial de Professores
Competências Docentes
Ética em IA
Responsividade Cultural

Como Citar

Dua, B., & Gupta, A. (2026). Desenvolvimento de um Framework Pedagógico Integrado de Inteligência Artificial para a Formação Inicial de Professores. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 7(i), e091. https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v7ii.91

Resumo

Objetivo: Este estudo tem como objetivo desenvolver um Framework Pedagógico Integrado de Inteligência Artificial para a formação inicial de professores, considerando a necessidade de preparar futuros docentes para integrar a IA de forma técnica, pedagógica, ética e culturalmente responsável.

Metodologia: A pesquisa adota uma abordagem conceitual, fundamentada no paradigma construtivista-interpretativista. O estudo utiliza análise de framework conceitual, com base na síntese sistemática da literatura, de perspectivas teóricas e de documentos de políticas internacionais e nacionais sobre inteligência artificial, educação e formação docente.

Resultados: O framework proposto integra quatro domínios de competência inter-relacionados: técnico, pedagógico, ético e cultural. Esses domínios são orientados por seis princípios fundamentais: pedagogia centrada no ser humano, adaptabilidade dinâmica, equidade e inclusão, responsabilidade ética, responsividade cultural e alinhamento com políticas educacionais. O modelo apresenta uma abordagem multidimensional para superar a fragmentação dos frameworks existentes e apoiar a preparação de professores para ambientes educacionais mediados por IA.

Contribuições: O estudo contribui para a literatura ao propor um modelo conceitual integrado, aplicável à formação inicial de professores, que articula competências, princípios e diretrizes para o uso responsável da IA na educação. O framework oferece subsídios para currículo, formação docente, avaliação de competências e futuras pesquisas empíricas.

Originalidade: A originalidade do estudo está na proposição de um modelo integrado que posiciona as dimensões ética e cultural como componentes centrais, e não periféricos, da formação docente para o uso da inteligência artificial em contextos educacionais diversos.

 

https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v7ii.91

Referências

Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2(3), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7

Aktulun, Ö. U., Kasapoğlu, K., & Aydoğdu, B. (2024). Comparing Turkish pre-service STEM and non-STEM teachers' attitudes and anxiety toward artificial intelligence. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 23(5), 950–963. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.950

Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2022). Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(4), 1052–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9

Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Crow. Polity Press.

Birhane, A. (2021). The impossibility of automating ambiguity. Artificial Life, 27(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1162/artl_a_00336

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Celik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers' professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behaviour, 138, Article 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468

Choudhury, S., Deb, J. P., Pradhan, P., & Mishra, A. (2024). Validation of the teachers AI-TPACK scale for the Indian educational setting. International Journal of Experimental Research and Review, 43(Special Issue). https://doi.org/10.52756/ijerr.2024.v43spl.009

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551

Government of India. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Ministry of Education. https://www.education.gov.in/nep-2020

Hastomo, T., Mandasari, B., & Widiati, U. (2024). Scrutinizing Indonesian pre-service teachers' technological knowledge in utilizing AI-powered tools. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(4), 1572–1581. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21644

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://curriculumredesign.org/wp-content/uploads/AIED-Book-Excerpt-CCR.pdf

Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, Article 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001

Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a conceptual framework: Philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800406

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782551

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2022). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021a). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, K. W. S., & Qiao, M. S. (2021b). AI literacy: Definition, teaching, evaluation and ethical issues. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 504–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.487

Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child (H. Weaver, Trans.). Basic Books. (Original work published 1966)

Quarshie, B., Mngwevu, P. M., Amponsah, A., Nyawo, T. M. N., Ngwenya, P. J., & Taley, I. B. (2025). AI integration in African higher education. International Business Conference. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397081552_AI_INTEGRATION_IN_AFRICAN_HIGHER_EDUCATION

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Sperling, K., Stenberg, C. J., McGrath, C., Åkerfeldt, A., Heintz, F., & Stenliden, L. (2024). In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in teacher education: A scoping review. Computers and Education Open, 6, Article 100169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100169

Sun, J., & Huang, K. (2025). Exploring the role of generative AI in collaborative lesson planning for pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 210, Article 104891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.104891

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606

UNESCO. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376709

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.

Wei, L., Wang, S., Koszalka, T. A., Lee, S., & Liu, Y. (2025). Enhancing pre-service teachers' reflective thinking skills through generative AI-assisted digital storytelling creation: A three-dimensional framework analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 148, Article 104289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104289

Younis, M. (2024). Effectiveness of a professional development programme based on the instructional design framework for AI literacy in developing AI literacy skills among pre-service teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 40(3), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2024.2334567

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zhang, C., & Villanueva, L. E. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence preparedness and technological competence: Towards a digital education teacher training programme. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 11(2), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v11i2.13753

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Bindu Dua, Adit Gupta