Keywords
Higher Education
User Behavior
Ethical Perceptions
Learning
How to Cite
Abstract
Objective: This cross-sectional study involved distributing a survey to a sample of undergraduate college students AI-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors.
Method: A total of 258 out of 319 college students enrolled in a personal wellness elective completed this survey during class.
Results: Most participants (53.5%) reported familiarity with AI in general, often learning about it through the internet (79.1%). Participants who were frequent AI users more often said they were familiar with AI in general (62.3% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.04) and for educational purposes (52.3% vs. 34.8%, p = 0.02) and more frequently encountered AI information during class (42.5% vs. 23.9%, p = 0.002) compared with infrequent AI users. Frequent AI users more often agreed that AI makes learning easier (67.9% vs. 47.8%, p = 0.007), that AI use in school is ethical (27.2% vs. 8.1%, p<0.001), that AI improves writing skills (78.5% vs. 56.5%, p <0.001), improves critical thinking (36.2% vs. 19.7%, p =0.004), and improves interpersonal communication (38.3% vs. 24.8%, p = 0.035) compared to participants who less frequently used AI. Infrequent AI users more often agreed that using AI in class or for homework was cheating (56.6%, 25.2%, p <0.001), more often disagreed that they trusted AI as safe (51.1% vs. 26.2%, p <0.001), and more often turned to family and friends for information about AI (29.0% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.04) than frequent AI users.
Conclusion: Research into the role of AI in education is still preliminary, but this work can serve as a foundation for future studies.
References
Al-Zahrani, A. M., & Alasmari, T. M. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: The dynamics of ethical, social, and educational implications. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 912. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03432-4
AlDhaen, F. (2022). The use of artificial intelligence in higher education – Systematic review. In M. Alaali (Ed.), COVID-19 Challenges to University Information Technology Governance (pp. 269-285). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13351-0_13
Ayanwale, M. A., Sanusi, I. T., Adelana, O. P., Aruleba, K. D., & Oyelere, S. S. (2022). Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100099. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099
Berendt, B., Littlejohn, A., & Blakemore, M. (2020). AI in education: Learner choice and fundamental rights. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1786399
Borisov, B., & Stoyanova, T. (2024). Artificial intelligence in higher educaiton: Pros and cons. Science International Journal, 3(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0302001b
Cardona, M. A., Rodriguez, R. J., & Ishmael, K. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning. Retrieved October 31 from https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf
Castillo-Martínez, I. M., Flores-Bueno, D., Gómez-Puente, S. M., & Vite-León, V. O. (2024). Ai in higher education: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1391485
Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66(4), 616-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y
Cengage Group. (2024). 2024 Graduate Employability Report: Preparing students for the GenAI-driven workplace. Retrieved October 31 from https://cengage.widen.net/s/bmjxxjx9mm/cg-2024-employability-survey-rep
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Chen, N.-S., Yin, C., Isaias, P., & Psotka, J. (2020). Educational big data: Extracting meaning from data for smart education. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(2), 142-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1635395
Coffey, L. (2024). Professors cautious of tools to detect AI-generated writing. Retrieved October 31 from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/tech-innovation/artificial-intelligence/2024/02/09/professors-proceed-caution-using-ai
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Dwyer, M., & Laird, E. (2024). UIp in the air: Educators juggling the potential of generative AI with detection, discipline, and distrust. Retrieved October 31 from https://cdt.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2024-03-21-CDT-Civic-Tech-Generative-AI-Survey-Research-final.pdf
Edwards, B. (2023). Why AI writing detectors don't work. Retrieved October 31 from https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/07/why-ai-detectors-think-the-us-constitution-was-written-by-ai/
European Parliament. (2023). What is artificial intelligence and how is it used? Retrieved October 31 from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20200827STO85804/what-is-artificial-intelligence-and-how-is-it-used
Fowler, G. A. (2023). We test a new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent student. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/04/01/chatgpt-cheating-detection-turnitin/
Ghotbi, N., & Ho, M. T. (2021). Moral awareness of college students regarding artificial intelligence. Asian Bioethics Review, 13(4), 421-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-021-00182-2
Goulart, V. G., Liboni, L. B., & Cezarino, L. O. (2022). Balancing skills in the digital transformation era: The future of jobs and the role of higher education. Industry and Higher Education, 36(2), 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222211029796
Hinojo-Lucena, F.-J., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cáceres-Reche, M.-P., & Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M. (2019). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A bibliometric study on its impact in the scientific literature. Education Sciences, 9(1), 51. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/9/1/51
IBM Corp. (2024). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29.0. In IBM Corp.
Kennedy, B., Tyson, A., & Saks, E. (2023). Public awareness of artificial intelligence in everyday activities. Retrieved October 31 from https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/02/15/public-awareness-of-artificial-intelligence-in-everyday-activities/
Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1
McGrath, C., Cerratto Pargman, T., Juth, N., & Palmgren, P. J. (2023). University teachers' perceptions of responsibility and artificial intelligence in higher education - An experimental philosophical study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100139
Mowreader, A. (2024). Employers say students need AI skills. What if students don't want them? Retrieved October 31 from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/student-success/life-after-college/2024/10/03/are-ai-skills-key-part-career-preparation
National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE). (2023). Data-driven decision-making in education: How REL work makes a difference. Retrieved October 31 from https://ies.ed.gov/blogs/ncee/post/data-driven-decision-making-in-education-how-rel-work-makes-a
Nestor Maslej, Loredana Fattorini, Raymond Perrault, Vanessa Parli, Anka Reuel, Erik Brynjolfsson, John Etchemendy, Katrina Ligett, Terah Lyons, James Manyika, Juan Carlos Niebles, Yoav Shoham, Russell Wald, & Jack Clark. (2024). The AI Index 2024 Annual Report (AI Index Steering Committee, Institute for Human-Centered AI), https://aiindex.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/HAI_AI-Index-Report-2024.pdf
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2019). Trends shaping education 2019. Retrieved October 31 from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/trends-shaping-education-2019_trends_edu-2019-en
Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7893-7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9
Pearson PLC. (2024). End of semester AI report: More college students say AI is helping them get better grades. Retrieved October 25 from https://plc.pearson.com/en-GB/news-and-insights/news/end-semester-ai-report-more-college-students-say-ai-helping-them-get-better
Popenici, S. A., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8
Rodríguez-Ruiz, J., Marín-López, I., & Espejo-Siles, R. (2024). Is artificial intelligence use related to self-control, self-esteem and self-efficacy among university students? Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12906-6
Ruediger, D., Blankstein, M., & Love, S. (2024). Generative AI and postsecondary instructional practices: Findings from a national survey of instructors Retrieved October 31 from https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.320892
Southworth, J., Migliaccio, K., Glover, J., Glover, J., Reed, D., McCarty, C., Brendemuhl, J., & Thomas, A. (2023). Developing a model for AI across the curriculum: Transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in AI literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127
Stahl, B. C., Antoniou, J., Ryan, M., Macnish, K., & Jiya, T. (2022). Organisational responses to the ethical issues of artificial intelligence. AI & SOCIETY, 37(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01148-6
Stöhr, C., Ou, A. W., & Malmström, H. (2024). Perceptions and usage of AI chatbots among students in higher education across genders, academic levels and fields of study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100259
Surjadi, M. (2024). Colleges race to ready students for the AI workplace. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/us-news/education/colleges-race-to-ready-students-for-the-ai-workplace-cc936e5b
Tatar, C., Jiang, S., Rosé, C. P., & Chao, J. (2024). Exploring teachers’ views and confidence in the integration of an artificial intelligence curriculum into their classrooms: A case study of curricular co-design program. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00404-2
The Kirby Foundation. (2022). A brief history of AI. Retrieved October 31 from https://thefusioneer.com/blog/a-brief-history-of-ai/
U.S. Department of State. (n.d.). Artificial intelligence (AI). Retrieved October 31 from https://www.state.gov/artificial-intelligence
Walton Family Foundation. (2023). Teachers and students embrace ChatCPT for education. Retrieved October 31 from https://www.waltonfamilyfoundation.org/learning/teachers-and-students-embrace-chatgpt-for-education
Wang, H., Dang, A., Wu, Z., & Mac, S. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: Seeing CHATGPT through universities’ policies, resources, and Guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100326
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Corey H Basch, Grace Hillyer, Bailey Gold, Helen Yousaf